PureFeed vs Keyword blockers & muted words
Keyword blockers vs AI scoring: what actually cleans a feed?
Every major platform ships some version of muted words, and browser extensions have offered keyword blocking for a decade. It's the obvious first tool to reach for — type the thing you're sick of, never see the word again.
The problem is that the junk in your feed is rarely about a word. Rage-bait about any topic reads the same way: urgent, absolute, designed to make you feel something before you think. No keyword list catches "you won't believe what just happened" — and if one did, it would also catch your friend's genuinely surprising good news.
| Keyword blockers & muted words | PureFeed | |
|---|---|---|
| Catches | Exact strings and phrases you predicted in advance | Tone and intent — negativity, sensationalism, scamminess — regardless of wording |
| Misspellings & euphemisms | Miss ("p0litics", "the election thing") | Caught — the model reads meaning, not spelling |
| False positives | Blocks any post containing the word, including ones you'd want | Scores the whole post; a calm, useful post about a heated topic passes |
| Maintenance | You curate the list forever | Set a strength preset once; adjust only if you want to |
| Coverage | Per-platform settings, configured separately | Reddit, YouTube, X, and LinkedIn with one setup |
| Reversibility | Blocked posts are simply gone | Every hidden post collapses to a bar you can click to reveal |
If your problem is a word, mute the word. If your problem is the way your feed makes you feel by the third scroll, no list of words fixes that — the junk is a pattern of tone, and you need something that reads tone.
PureFeed scores every post for negativity, sensationalism, and usefulness, hides what falls outside your thresholds, and shows you a count of what you skipped. The free tier covers all four platforms.
Add PureFeed — free →Common questions
More comparisons: Site blockers & app timers · "Not interested" & algorithm training